Exit study
Tutor
Step 12 of 77

Legacy and denial

The Armenian Genocide had far-reaching consequences but also a complicated legacy.

  • Influence on Lemkin: Raphael Lemkin specifically cited the Armenian Genocide as a key motivation for coining the word genocide.

  • Hitler's reference: Adolf Hitler reportedly said before the invasion of Poland in 1939, "Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?" implying that the world's failure to remember Armenian victims meant Germany could expect similar impunity. Whether Hitler actually said this is disputed, but the line is widely cited as illustrating the dangers of forgetting.

  • Turkish denial: The Turkish government and many Turkish citizens continue to dispute the genocide characterization, arguing that the deaths were the result of war and disease rather than systematic killing. International scholarly consensus, however, recognizes the events as genocide. Many countries have formally recognized the Armenian Genocide; the United States did so officially in 2021.

  • The Armenian diaspora: Survivors and their descendants built communities worldwide, especially in France, the United States (particularly California), Lebanon, Russia, and Argentina. The diaspora has been a major force in advocating for international recognition.

Why this matters: The Armenian Genocide is the prototype of twentieth-century genocide. It shows the pattern that the Holocaust would later confirm: a modernizing state, in conditions of war or crisis, identifies a minority group as an internal enemy and uses bureaucratic and military methods to systematically destroy it. International responses are limited or absent. The lack of consequence creates conditions for further genocides. Maria should treat the Armenian case as both a tragedy in itself and as a warning that subsequent generations failed to heed.

Sign in to generate flashcards from this section.