All practiceAsk Professor Atlas
Pre-built cases + thesis templates · Reference · Part III prep

GLOBAL HISTORY & GEOGRAPHY II

Enduring Issues Essay Playbook

Pre-Built Cases, Thesis Templates, and Exam Strategy

I. What the Enduring Issues Essay Asks

The Enduring Issues essay is Part III of the Regents exam. It is worth 10 points, one-sixth of the total exam score. It is the most heavily prep-able part of the exam because the question structure is always the same: Maria receives five documents and must identify an enduring issue, argue why it has endured, and support her argument with at least three of the documents plus outside knowledge.

The five documents change every exam. The enduring issues do not. The NYS curriculum identifies a fixed list of enduring issues; the exam asks Maria to choose one of them and argue from it. Because the issues are known in advance, she can prepare specific case combinations for each one and deploy them on exam day depending on what the documents support.

Strategic insight: Strong Enduring Issues performance is mostly about preparation, not improvisation. Maria should walk into the exam already having three or four strong case combinations ready for the issues most likely to appear. On exam day, she identifies which enduring issue the documents best support and deploys her prepared cases. This playbook gives her that material.

The official enduring issues

The NYS Education Department recognizes the following enduring issues for this exam:

  • Power (and abuse of power)
  • Conflict
  • Inequality
  • Human rights violations
  • Desire for human rights
  • Scarcity
  • Impact of technology
  • Environmental impact
  • Cultural diffusion
  • Nationalism
  • Migration
  • Interconnectedness

Recent Regents exams have most commonly used: power and abuse of power, conflict, human rights violations / desire for human rights, nationalism, impact of technology, and inequality. Maria should prepare those most carefully. The others are possible but less likely.

II. How the Essay Is Scored

The official NYS rubric is a holistic scale, but it rewards specific elements. A strong 9–10 essay typically does all of the following:

  1. Clear thesis identifying the enduring issue. In the first paragraph, Maria names the issue, defines it briefly, and previews her supporting cases.
  2. Defines why the issue endures. She explains why it has persisted across multiple time periods and places, not just that examples exist.
  3. Uses at least three documents specifically. Each document is named ("As Document 3 shows…") and accurately interpreted.
  4. Adds outside knowledge. Specific names, dates, terms, or events not in the documents demonstrate Maria's broader knowledge.
  5. Develops at least three historical examples. Each case is explained in enough detail to be persuasive, with specific facts.
  6. Organizes coherently. Introduction with thesis, body paragraphs focused on each case, conclusion that reinforces the argument.
  7. Writes clearly. Strong vocabulary, complete sentences, minimal errors.

What loses points

  • Vague thesis that does not name a specific enduring issue
  • Failing to explain why the issue endures (just listing examples)
  • Using fewer than three documents
  • Misinterpreting documents
  • No outside knowledge (just summarizing documents)
  • Short essay (less than four substantial paragraphs)
  • Off-topic content

Recommended structure

A four- or five-paragraph essay is the standard. Maria should plan for approximately:

  • Paragraph 1 (introduction): Hook, identify the issue, define it briefly, thesis statement previewing three cases. Approximately 4–6 sentences.
  • Paragraphs 2–4 (body): One paragraph per case. Each paragraph develops one historical example with specific facts and reference to one or more documents. Approximately 6–8 sentences each.
  • Paragraph 5 (conclusion): Reinforce the thesis, note how the issue continues to matter today, brief closing thought. Approximately 3–4 sentences.

Total length: roughly 350–500 words. Quality matters more than length. A focused 4-paragraph essay scores better than a rambling 7-paragraph one.

III. Pre-Built Case Combinations

For each enduring issue, Maria has multiple strong cases available from the course. The combinations below are designed to be deployed flexibly: she chooses whichever three the documents best support.

1. Power and Abuse of Power

Definition: The exercise of political, economic, or military authority, and the ways that authority has been used to oppress, exploit, or harm others.

Why it endures: Throughout history, those holding power have often used it to dominate, exploit, or destroy those without power. The pattern recurs across cultures, regions, and centuries.

Strongest cases available

  • Case A — Absolutism (Unit 10.1): Louis XIV of France ("L'état, c'est moi") concentrated power in the monarchy, suppressed religious minorities (revoked Edict of Nantes), and built Versailles as a display of royal absolutism. Other examples: Peter the Great, Spanish Habsburgs.
  • Case B — European imperialism (Unit 10.4): European powers divided Africa at the Berlin Conference (1884–85) without any African representation. King Leopold II's Congo Free State killed perhaps 10 million through forced labor. British India saw the Sepoy Rebellion crushed and the Raj imposed. The pattern: powerful states using military and administrative power to dominate weaker societies.
  • Case C — Totalitarianism (Unit 10.5): Stalin's USSR conducted forced collectivization (the Ukrainian famine killed 3–7 million), the Great Purge (700,000–1.2 million executed), and built the Gulag. Hitler's Nazi Germany used state power for the Holocaust. Mao's China conducted the Cultural Revolution and the Great Leap Forward famine (15–45 million dead).
  • Case D — Apartheid (Unit 10.7): The South African government from 1948 to 1994 used state power to enforce racial segregation, deny citizenship to Black South Africans through the Bantustan system, and suppress dissent through police violence (Sharpeville 1960, Soweto 1976). Mandela imprisoned for 27 years.
  • Case E — Contemporary authoritarianism (Unit 10.9–10.10): China's persecution of the Uyghurs (mass detention, forced labor, coercive birth control), Myanmar's persecution of the Rohingya, Russia's invasion of Ukraine all show contemporary abuse of power.

Sample thesis: Power and abuse of power is an enduring issue because throughout history those holding political, economic, or military authority have often used that authority to oppress, exploit, or destroy those without it. This issue is visible in European imperialism's domination of Africa and Asia in the late nineteenth century, in the totalitarian violence of Stalin's USSR and Nazi Germany in the twentieth century, and in the apartheid system that Nelson Mandela ultimately overcame in South Africa. Each case shows how concentrated power can be used to deny dignity and life to subject populations, and how the development of international human rights frameworks has been a response to these patterns.

2. Conflict

Definition: Disputes between groups, often involving military, political, economic, or ideological struggle.

Why it endures: Throughout history, rival groups (nations, religions, classes, ideologies) have used various means to advance their interests against others. Conflict's specific forms evolve, but its persistence is consistent.

Strongest cases available

  • Case A — World War I (Unit 10.5): Caused by MAIN (militarism, alliances, imperialism, nationalism). Triggered by assassination of Franz Ferdinand. Killed 9–10 million soldiers plus 8 million civilians. Trench warfare on Western Front. Industrial-scale warfare with new weapons (machine guns, poison gas, tanks).
  • Case B — World War II (Unit 10.5): Caused by the unresolved problems of WWI: Versailles harshness, Great Depression, rise of fascism, appeasement. Killed 70–85 million. European theater and Pacific theater. Holocaust within the war. Ended with atomic bombs.
  • Case C — Cold War proxy conflicts (Unit 10.6): Korean War (1950–53) divided Korea at 38th parallel. Vietnam War (1955–1975) ended in communist victory. Cuban Missile Crisis (1962) closest to nuclear war. Afghanistan (1979–89) was Soviet Union's Vietnam. Conflict fought through proxies because nuclear weapons made direct great-power war unthinkable.
  • Case D — Israeli-Palestinian conflict (Unit 10.7): Origins in late nineteenth century Zionism and Balfour Declaration. 1948 war and Israel's founding. Six-Day War 1967 expanded Israeli territory. Camp David Accords 1978 and Oslo Accords 1993 attempted peace. Conflict continues.
  • Case E — Decolonization wars (Unit 10.7): Algerian War (1954–1962) killed 300,000–500,000. Vietnam War. African liberation wars. Where colonial powers refused peaceful transition, violence ensued.

Sample thesis: Conflict is an enduring issue because throughout history rival nations, ideologies, and peoples have used military, political, and economic means to advance competing interests. This issue is visible in the World Wars of the twentieth century, in the Cold War's proxy conflicts that played out across the developing world, and in the long-running Israeli-Palestinian dispute that continues today. The specific forms of conflict have evolved with technology and political circumstances, but the underlying pattern of organized human struggle has remained one of the most persistent features of modern history.

3. Human Rights Violations

Definition: Systematic denial of fundamental rights including life, dignity, freedom from torture, freedom of expression, and equality before the law.

Why it endures: Across history, governments and movements have committed atrocities against people for their identity, ideology, or perceived threat. The same impulses have produced repeated violations across centuries.

Strongest cases available

  • Case A — Armenian Genocide (Unit 10.10): Ottoman government killed approximately 1.5 million Armenians from 1915 to 1923 during and after WWI. Deportations, death marches, massacres. First major genocide of the twentieth century. Raphael Lemkin cited it as motivation for coining "genocide."
  • Case B — Holocaust (Units 10.5 and 10.10): Nazi Germany killed 6 million Jews and 11 million total. Wannsee Conference (1942) coordinated the Final Solution. Industrial extermination camps including Auschwitz. Produced the postwar international human rights framework: Nuremberg Trials, UN, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Genocide Convention.
  • Case C — Apartheid (Unit 10.7): South African legal racial segregation 1948–1994. Population Registration Act, Group Areas Act, Bantustans, pass laws. Sharpeville Massacre 1960, Soweto Uprising 1976. UN declared apartheid a crime against humanity in 1973.
  • Case D — Rwandan Genocide (Unit 10.10): Hutu extremists killed approximately 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus in 100 days in 1994. Belgian colonial policy had hardened Hutu-Tutsi distinctions. International community failed catastrophically. Led to ICTR and the doctrine of Responsibility to Protect.
  • Case E — Cambodian Genocide (Unit 10.10): Khmer Rouge under Pol Pot killed 1.5–2 million Cambodians (about a quarter of population) from 1975 to 1979. Forced labor, Killing Fields, S-21. Most extreme case of revolutionary ideological genocide.

Sample thesis: Human rights violations is an enduring issue because throughout history governments and movements have committed atrocities against populations for their identity, ideology, or perceived threat. This issue is visible in the Armenian Genocide carried out by the Ottoman Empire during WWI, in the Nazi Holocaust that killed six million Jews in WWII, and in the Rwandan Genocide of 1994 in which Hutu extremists killed approximately 800,000 Tutsis in 100 days. Each forced the international community to develop new institutions and norms, but the recurrence of mass atrocities across the twentieth and twenty-first centuries shows that the issue has not been resolved.

4. Desire for Human Rights

Definition: The recurring movements and demands by people for recognition of their fundamental dignity, freedom, equality, and participation in their own governance.

Why it endures: People have consistently demanded rights even at great personal cost, across cultures and centuries. The desire is one of the most persistent drivers of political action.

Strongest cases available

  • Case A — Enlightenment thought and American/French Revolutions (Unit 10.2): Locke's natural rights, Rousseau's social contract, the American Declaration of Independence ("all men are created equal"), the French Declaration of the Rights of Man (1789). These set the philosophical foundation for modern human rights claims.
  • Case B — Gandhi and Indian independence (Unit 10.7): Satyagraha (truth force) and ahimsa (nonviolence) used to demand independence from Britain. Salt March of 1930 mobilized millions. Independence achieved in 1947. Gandhi's methods influenced the American civil rights movement and the anti-apartheid struggle.
  • Case C — Mandela and the anti-apartheid struggle (Unit 10.7): ANC organized resistance for decades. Sharpeville Massacre 1960 and Soweto Uprising 1976 escalated conflict. International sanctions pressured the regime. Mandela's 27 years in prison gave him moral authority. De Klerk negotiated transition. 1994 elections produced multiracial democracy.
  • Case D — Postwar human rights framework (Units 10.5 and 10.10): Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), Genocide Convention (1948), International Criminal Court (2002), Responsibility to Protect (2005). Built specifically to give legal force to the desire for universal human rights.
  • Case E — End of communism in Eastern Europe (Unit 10.6): Solidarity in Poland (Lech Walesa, 1980). Czech Velvet Revolution (1989). Mass protests in East Germany producing fall of Berlin Wall (November 1989). Citizens demanding democratic rights succeeded when Soviet leader Gorbachev refused to use force to preserve communist regimes.

Sample thesis: The desire for human rights is an enduring issue because throughout history people have demanded recognition of their fundamental dignity, freedom, and equality, often at great personal cost. This issue is visible in the Enlightenment principles that produced the American and French Revolutions in the late eighteenth century, in Mahatma Gandhi's nonviolent struggle for Indian independence in the twentieth century, and in Nelson Mandela's leadership of the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa. Each movement built on previous demands for rights and inspired subsequent ones, demonstrating that the desire for human dignity has been one of the most persistent drivers of political action across the modern era.

5. Nationalism

Definition: The belief that peoples sharing common identity (language, ethnicity, history, culture, or religion) should have political self-determination, often through their own nation-state.

Why it endures: Nationalism has been one of the most powerful political forces of the modern era, producing both the unification of nations and the conflicts between them. It continues to shape politics today.

Strongest cases available

  • Case A — German and Italian unification (Unit 10.2): Bismarck unified Germany through three wars and Realpolitik ("blood and iron"). Italy unified through Mazzini (soul), Cavour (brain), and Garibaldi (sword). Nationalism as a unifying force in the nineteenth century.
  • Case B — European imperialism and WWI (Units 10.4 and 10.5): Nationalism extended into imperial competition (the same force that unified Germany now drove European competition for empire). Slavic nationalism produced the assassination of Franz Ferdinand. WWI killed millions partly because of nationalist intransigence.
  • Case C — Fascism and Nazism (Unit 10.5): Hyper-nationalism in Italy under Mussolini and Germany under Hitler. National greatness, racial purity, expansion to recover "lost" lands. Produced WWII.
  • Case D — Anti-colonial nationalism (Unit 10.7): Indian National Congress, Gandhi, Nehru. African nationalist movements: Nkrumah's Ghana, the ANC. Vietnamese nationalism under Ho Chi Minh. Nationalism as the principal force dissolving European empires.
  • Case E — Contemporary nationalism (Unit 10.9): Hindu nationalism in India (BJP, Modi). Russian nationalism under Putin (invasion of Ukraine 2022). Populist nationalist movements in many democracies (Brexit, etc.). Nationalism's continued power in the twenty-first century.

Sample thesis: Nationalism is an enduring issue because throughout modern history the belief that peoples sharing common identity should have political self-determination has been one of the most powerful forces in world politics. This issue is visible in the unification of Germany and Italy in the nineteenth century, in the hyper-nationalism of fascist and Nazi regimes that produced World War II, and in the anti-colonial nationalist movements that dissolved European empires across Asia and Africa in the twentieth century. The same force has produced both new nation-states and devastating wars, showing how nationalism's effects depend on the political conditions and choices through which it is expressed.

6. Impact of Technology

Definition: The ways that new technologies have transformed economies, societies, politics, warfare, and human relationships.

Why it endures: Throughout history, new technologies have produced both benefits and disruptions, and have repeatedly reshaped what societies look like and what they can do.

Strongest cases available

  • Case A — Industrial Revolution (Unit 10.3): Steam engine, factories, railroads, telegraph. Transformed economies and social structures. Created industrial working class. Enabled urbanization, mass production, and rapid transportation. Began approximately 1750–1850 in Britain, then spread globally.
  • Case B — Industrial warfare and WWI (Unit 10.5): Machine guns produced trench warfare. Poison gas, tanks, airplanes, submarines transformed combat. Industrial production allowed prolonged total war. WWI casualties (16–17 million dead) were unprecedented because of technology.
  • Case C — Atomic weapons (Units 10.5 and 10.6): Atomic bombs ended WWII and inaugurated the nuclear age. Mutually Assured Destruction shaped Cold War strategy. Nuclear weapons have prevented direct great-power war while creating existential risk.
  • Case D — Digital revolution (Unit 10.9): World Wide Web (developed 1989–91 by Berners-Lee), mobile phones, social media, artificial intelligence. Transformed communication, commerce, politics, and daily life. Connected billions of people while creating new vulnerabilities (disinformation, surveillance, AI displacement).
  • Case E — Climate change (Unit 10.9): Industrial technology (fossil fuels) has produced greenhouse gas emissions causing climate change. The same technology that created modern prosperity has produced the most consequential environmental challenge in human history.

Sample thesis: The impact of technology is an enduring issue because throughout history new technologies have repeatedly transformed economies, societies, and politics, producing both unprecedented benefits and serious disruptions. This issue is visible in the Industrial Revolution that began in eighteenth-century Britain and transformed every aspect of life, in the industrial weapons that made twentieth-century warfare catastrophic, and in the digital revolution that has reshaped commerce, communication, and daily life since the 1990s. Each transformation has produced winners and losers, both opportunities and risks, demonstrating that technology's effects depend on how societies choose to deploy and govern it.

7. Inequality

Definition: Unequal distribution of wealth, power, opportunity, or rights between individuals or groups within or between societies.

Why it endures: Inequality has appeared in every society in modern history, taking different forms but reflecting persistent patterns of advantage and disadvantage.

Strongest cases available

  • Case A — Estate system and the French Revolution (Unit 10.2): First Estate (clergy), Second Estate (nobility), Third Estate (everyone else) in pre-revolutionary France. Top 2% of population paid no taxes; bottom 98% bore most of the tax burden. Helped produce the French Revolution.
  • Case B — Industrial Revolution inequality (Unit 10.3): Sharp class divisions emerged: industrial capitalists, professional middle class, urban working class. Workers labored 12–16 hours in dangerous conditions for subsistence wages. Children worked. Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto was a response.
  • Case C — Imperialism and unequal global development (Unit 10.4): European powers extracted wealth from colonies while imposing economic structures that prevented colonial economic development. The wealth gap between Europe and its colonies widened dramatically over the imperial era.
  • Case D — Apartheid (Unit 10.7): Legal racial inequality in South Africa from 1948 to 1994. Bantustans, pass laws, separate (and inferior) education and services for Black South Africans. The most extreme case of state-imposed inequality in the course.
  • Case E — Globalization-era inequality (Unit 10.9): Inequality within countries has risen sharply in recent decades. Top 1% globally captured disproportionate share of growth. Working-class manufacturing employment in developed countries declined. China lifted hundreds of millions out of poverty but inequality within China grew.

Sample thesis: Inequality is an enduring issue because throughout history wealth, power, opportunity, and rights have been distributed unequally between groups in ways that have produced both injustice and political reaction. This issue is visible in the estate system of pre-revolutionary France that contributed to the French Revolution, in the sharp class divisions produced by the Industrial Revolution that motivated Marx's Communist Manifesto, and in the apartheid system of South Africa that institutionalized racial inequality before being overcome through Nelson Mandela's leadership. Each case shows how unequal distribution of opportunity has produced political movements demanding change, while also showing how persistent inequality has been across centuries.

8. Cultural Diffusion

Definition: The spread of ideas, technologies, practices, religions, and cultural products from one society to another.

Why it endures: Throughout history, contact between societies has produced exchange that transforms both sides. Diffusion intensifies with new communication and transportation technologies.

Strongest cases available

  • Case A — Columbian Exchange (Unit 10.1): Plants, animals, peoples, and diseases exchanged between Old and New Worlds after 1492. Transformed diets, economies, and demographics on all continents. Potato to Europe, horses to the Americas, smallpox to Indigenous peoples.
  • Case B — Enlightenment spread (Unit 10.2): European Enlightenment ideas (Locke, Rousseau, Montesquieu) spread to American and French revolutionaries, then to Latin American independence leaders (Bolívar), then around the world. Influenced movements from Haiti to India.
  • Case C — Industrial Revolution spread (Unit 10.3): Began in Britain; spread to Belgium, France, Germany, the United States, then Russia, Japan, and beyond. Japan's Meiji Restoration deliberately adopted Western industrial methods while preserving cultural distinctiveness.
  • Case D — Spread of modernization globally (Unit 10.8): Modernization spread from Western Europe globally through imperialism, voluntary adoption, and revolutionary movements. Selective adaptation has been the norm: Japan, Turkey under Atatürk, Saudi Arabia, China all chose different combinations of Western and traditional elements.
  • Case E — Digital globalization (Unit 10.9): Internet and mobile phones have intensified cultural exchange dramatically. Music, video, news, and ideas now spread globally in real time. Western (especially American) cultural products have global reach; non-Western cultures have also flowed in the reverse direction.

Sample thesis: Cultural diffusion is an enduring issue because throughout history contact between societies has produced exchange that transforms both sides. This issue is visible in the Columbian Exchange that connected the Old and New Worlds after 1492, in the spread of Enlightenment ideas that shaped revolutions from America to Latin America to colonial independence movements, and in contemporary globalization that has accelerated cultural exchange to unprecedented speed and scale. Each wave of diffusion has both enriched societies through exchange and produced resistance to perceived threats to cultural identity, showing how cultural diffusion is a continuous and complex process rather than a simple one-way transmission.

9. Environmental Impact

Definition: The effects of human activity on the natural environment, including pollution, resource depletion, ecosystem damage, and climate change.

Why it endures: Human activity has reshaped the natural environment throughout history, and the scale of impact has grown dramatically with industrialization and population growth.

Strongest cases available

  • Case A — Columbian Exchange ecological effects (Unit 10.1): Introduction of European livestock and crops transformed American ecosystems. American crops transformed European agriculture. Disease ecology was reshaped, with catastrophic effects on Indigenous American populations.
  • Case B — Industrial Revolution pollution (Unit 10.3): Industrial cities like Manchester suffered severe air and water pollution. Coal smoke darkened skies. Rivers became sewers. Industrial Revolution began the human transformation of the global atmosphere through carbon emissions.
  • Case C — Climate change (Unit 10.9): Burning of fossil fuels since the Industrial Revolution has raised atmospheric CO2 from 280 to over 420 parts per million. Global temperatures have risen 1.2°C above pre-industrial levels. Effects include rising seas, extreme weather, ecosystem disruption. Kyoto Protocol (1997) and Paris Agreement (2015) are inadequate international responses.
  • Case D — Deforestation and biodiversity loss (Unit 10.9): Amazon rainforest, Indonesian forests, African forests cleared for agriculture and timber. Species extinction at 100–1,000 times normal rates. The current period is sometimes called the sixth mass extinction.

Sample thesis: Environmental impact is an enduring issue because human activity has continuously reshaped the natural environment, with effects that have grown dramatically in scale since the Industrial Revolution. This issue is visible in the ecological transformations of the Columbian Exchange that connected the Old and New Worlds, in the industrial pollution that accompanied the Industrial Revolution in nineteenth-century Europe, and in the climate change crisis that emerged from two centuries of fossil fuel use and now threatens human civilization itself. The scale of human environmental impact has grown over centuries, and international responses through agreements like the Paris Climate Agreement have so far been inadequate to address the most serious challenges.

10. Migration

Definition: Movement of people from one place to another, whether voluntary (economic migration, settlement) or forced (refugees, slavery, expulsion).

Why it endures: People have moved across borders throughout history for economic opportunity, escape from violence, or in response to environmental changes. The patterns persist even as their specific forms evolve.

Strongest cases available

  • Case A — Atlantic slave trade (Unit 10.1): 12–15 million enslaved Africans were transported across the Atlantic between 1500 and 1870. The largest forced migration in human history. Transformed demographics, economies, and cultures of the Americas, Africa, and Europe.
  • Case B — Industrial Revolution urbanization (Unit 10.3): Massive movement from countryside to industrial cities within Europe and beyond. By 1900, Britain had become predominantly urban for the first time in human history. Industrial labor required mass migration.
  • Case C — Partition of India (Unit 10.7): Approximately 12–15 million people migrated across the new India-Pakistan border in 1947, with hundreds of thousands to millions killed in communal violence. The largest mass migration in modern history.
  • Case D — Holocaust and Jewish refugees (Units 10.5 and 10.10): Nazi persecution drove Jewish refugees out of Germany and Europe in the 1930s; most countries restricted immigration. The Holocaust killed those who could not escape. Postwar Holocaust survivors became one of several refugee flows that motivated the 1951 Refugee Convention.
  • Case E — Contemporary migration (Unit 10.9): Approximately 280 million people live outside their country of birth as of the 2020s. Major flows: Latin America to North America, South Asia to the Persian Gulf, Africa to Europe. Syrian refugees (6 million), Ukrainian refugees (6 million), Rohingya (750,000). Migration has become a major political issue in receiving countries.

Sample thesis: Migration is an enduring issue because throughout history people have moved across borders in response to economic opportunity, political crisis, or violence, transforming both the societies they leave and the societies they enter. This issue is visible in the Atlantic slave trade that forcibly transported 12–15 million enslaved Africans to the Americas, in the partition of British India in 1947 that produced the largest mass migration in modern history, and in contemporary migration flows that have made migration one of the central political issues of the early twenty-first century. Across these cases, migration has produced both opportunity and conflict, demonstrating its persistent role in shaping the modern world.

11. Interconnectedness

Definition: The connections between regions, economies, and societies that have grown over time, producing both shared benefits and shared vulnerabilities.

Why it endures: Throughout history, contact and exchange between regions have grown. Each major expansion of connection has produced economic growth, cultural exchange, and new forms of mutual dependency.

Strongest cases available

  • Case A — Columbian Exchange (Unit 10.1): Created the first truly global economy by connecting the Americas, Europe, Africa, and Asia. Crops, animals, peoples, diseases, and currencies flowed across previously separated worlds.
  • Case B — Industrial Revolution global trade (Units 10.3 and 10.4): Industrial production required raw materials from around the world. Imperial systems were partly built to secure those materials. Telegraph and steamship dramatically reduced communication and transportation times.
  • Case C — Globalization since the Cold War (Unit 10.9): WTO, NAFTA, EU. Multinational corporations and global supply chains. Internet connects billions. China's rise reshapes global economic geography.
  • Case D — COVID-19 pandemic (Unit 10.9): Demonstrated both the speed of disease spread through interconnected world and the speed of international scientific cooperation in developing vaccines. Killed 7 million people, disrupted economies, exposed supply chain vulnerabilities.
  • Case E — 2008 financial crisis (Unit 10.9): U.S. subprime mortgage crisis triggered global recession because financial systems are integrated. Banks worldwide required government bailouts. European sovereign debt crisis followed in 2010–2012.

Sample thesis: Interconnectedness is an enduring issue because throughout history connections between regions have grown, producing both shared benefits and shared vulnerabilities. This issue is visible in the Columbian Exchange that first connected the Old and New Worlds after 1492, in the global trade networks established during the Industrial Revolution and imperial era, and in the contemporary globalization that integrated economies, technologies, and cultures to unprecedented depth before being tested by the 2008 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. Each expansion of interconnectedness has produced new opportunities for prosperity and new ways for crises to spread, showing how the world's growing integration is one of the most persistent features of modern history.

IV. Strategy on Exam Day

Step 1: Read the documents quickly (5 minutes)

Maria has five documents. Her first task is to skim them quickly to identify the general theme. She should not try to deeply analyze each document yet; she just needs to know what each is about.

As she reads, she should look for recurring themes across the documents. The Regents always selects documents that support multiple possible enduring issues, but usually one or two are most clearly supported.

Step 2: Match documents to enduring issues (3 minutes)

Maria should ask herself: "Which enduring issue is most clearly supported by at least three of these documents?" The answer is rarely just one issue; usually two or three are defensible. She should choose the issue she has the strongest pre-built cases for.

Decision rule: If documents primarily describe states or rulers harming subjects → power and abuse of power. If they describe wars or fighting → conflict. If they describe atrocities against specific groups → human rights violations. If they describe people demanding rights → desire for human rights. If they describe technology transforming society → impact of technology. If they describe sharp differences in wealth or status → inequality. If they describe national movements or identity → nationalism. If they describe ideas or practices spreading → cultural diffusion. If they describe environment damage → environmental impact. If they describe movement of people → migration. If they describe connections across regions → interconnectedness.

Step 3: Plan the essay (5 minutes)

Maria should sketch a quick outline. She does not need to write the whole essay; she just needs to know:

  • Her thesis (one sentence)
  • Which three cases she will use (one per body paragraph)
  • Which documents support each case (at least one document per body paragraph)
  • Her conclusion (one or two sentences about why the issue continues)

Step 4: Write the essay (30 minutes)

Maria should write efficiently. Each paragraph should have a clear function:

  • Paragraph 1: Introduce the issue, define it, state the thesis with three cases previewed.
  • Paragraphs 2–4: Develop each case. Each paragraph opens with a topic sentence, presents specific facts (names, dates, terms), references at least one document, and explains how the case illustrates the enduring issue.
  • Paragraph 5: Reinforce the thesis. Note how the issue continues to matter today. Brief closing thought.

Step 5: Review (5 minutes)

Maria should reread her essay, checking that:

  • Her thesis is clear and specific
  • She has used at least three documents (named in her essay)
  • She has added outside knowledge (specific names, dates, terms not in the documents)
  • Her cases are developed enough to be persuasive
  • Her grammar and spelling are reasonable

V. Choosing the Right Enduring Issue

Sometimes the documents support multiple enduring issues equally well. In that case, Maria should choose based on which issue she can argue most strongly with her prepared material.

Common ambiguous cases

Documents about wars and military conflict could support: conflict, power and abuse of power, nationalism, impact of technology. Choose conflict if the documents emphasize the fighting itself. Choose nationalism if they emphasize national identities driving the conflict. Choose power and abuse of power if they emphasize one side dominating another. Choose impact of technology if they emphasize weapons or military methods.

Documents about colonialism could support: power and abuse of power, cultural diffusion, inequality, nationalism (both imperial and anti-colonial). Choose power and abuse of power if the documents emphasize domination and exploitation. Choose nationalism if they emphasize national motives for empire or anti-colonial response. Choose cultural diffusion if they emphasize the spread of European institutions, language, or religion.

Documents about genocides and atrocities could support: human rights violations, power and abuse of power, conflict. Human rights violations is usually the strongest choice for genocide documents. Power and abuse of power works if documents emphasize state action against subjects. Conflict works if documents emphasize war contexts.

Documents about movements demanding rights could support: desire for human rights, inequality, nationalism. Desire for human rights is usually strongest for civil rights and dignity-focused movements. Inequality works for movements challenging specific unequal systems (apartheid, caste, class). Nationalism works for self-determination movements.

Documents about technology could support: impact of technology, cultural diffusion, environmental impact, interconnectedness. Impact of technology is the most direct choice. Cultural diffusion works if technology is spreading between regions. Environmental impact works if technology is damaging the environment. Interconnectedness works if technology is connecting previously separated places.

VI. Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

Mistake 1: Vague thesis

Bad: "Throughout history, many things have happened. These documents show some of them."

Good: "Power and abuse of power is an enduring issue because throughout history those holding political authority have often used that authority to oppress, exploit, or destroy those without it."

The thesis must name a specific enduring issue and define why it endures. Generic statements lose points.

Mistake 2: Just summarizing documents

Some students just describe each document one by one without making an argument. This loses major points. The essay must use documents as evidence for an argument, not just describe their content.

Better approach: Open each body paragraph with a topic sentence about the case. Use the document as evidence for that case. Add outside knowledge to develop the case further. Connect the case back to the enduring issue.

Mistake 3: No outside knowledge

Essays that only use documents and add nothing more score lower than essays that integrate specific outside knowledge. Maria should always include names, dates, terms, or events not mentioned in the documents.

Example: If a document mentions European colonization of Africa, Maria can add: "The Berlin Conference of 1884–85 established the rules under which European powers divided Africa without any African representation, leading to almost complete European control within twenty years."

Mistake 4: Too few documents

The instructions require at least three documents. Some students use fewer. Some use three but reference them only briefly. Maria should explicitly cite at least three documents ("As Document 2 shows…") and use each substantively.

Mistake 5: Picking the wrong enduring issue

Some students pick an enduring issue that does not fit the documents well. They struggle to find evidence and write a weak essay. Better to choose an issue that fits the documents naturally, even if it is not Maria's first choice.

Strategy: Before writing, Maria should test her chosen issue against the documents. Can she clearly use three documents to support it? If she has to stretch, she should consider a different issue.

Mistake 6: No explanation of why the issue endures

The prompt specifically asks Maria to argue why the issue has endured across time. Some students just give examples without explaining the pattern. The essay must include explicit analysis of why the issue persists.

Example: "This issue endures because power asymmetries have appeared in every society throughout history. Wherever some groups have controlled political, economic, or military authority, they have frequently used it against those without such authority. The pattern recurs because the underlying dynamic of concentrated power being used to dominate others is built into how political systems work."

Mistake 7: Time mismanagement

Some students spend so much time on the multiple choice or CRQs that they have only 20 minutes left for the essay. The Enduring Issues essay is worth 10 points; it deserves at least 40 minutes. Maria should budget her time so she has 40–45 minutes for this essay.

VII. Sample Full Essays

Two sample essays follow, demonstrating what a 9–10 point Enduring Issues essay looks like. Maria should use them as models, not memorize them.

Sample Essay 1: Power and Abuse of Power

Imagine the documents include: a description of King Leopold II's Congo Free State, the Wannsee Conference, Mandela's Rivonia Trial statement, a description of the Rwandan Genocide, and a contemporary description of human rights challenges.

Sample essay:

Power and abuse of power is one of the most enduring issues of the modern era. Those holding political, economic, or military authority have repeatedly used that authority to oppress, exploit, or destroy those without it, producing some of the worst atrocities in human history. This pattern is visible in European imperialism's brutal exploitation of African societies in the late nineteenth century, in the Nazi government's industrial murder of European Jews during World War II, and in the international community's failure to prevent the Rwandan Genocide of 1994. Each case shows how concentrated power can be turned against subject populations, and how the development of international human rights frameworks has been an ongoing but incomplete response to this enduring pattern.

In the late nineteenth century, European imperial powers used military and administrative power to dominate African societies on an unprecedented scale. As Document 1 describes, King Leopold II of Belgium ruled the Congo Free State as personal property from 1885 to 1908. His regime extracted rubber and ivory through forced labor, mutilation, and mass killing, producing perhaps 10 million deaths in a population that had no defense against superior European military technology. The Berlin Conference of 1884–85 had established the rules under which European powers divided Africa without any African representation, providing diplomatic cover for the abuses that followed. This case illustrates the enduring issue because it shows how political authority, when unconstrained by accountability to those subject to it, can be used for devastating exploitation.

The Nazi regime in Germany during World War II produced the most extensive abuse of state power in modern history. As Document 2 describes, the Wannsee Conference of January 1942 coordinated the Final Solution, the systematic extermination of European Jews. The Nazi state used its full bureaucratic, military, and industrial capacity to murder six million Jews and millions of others including Roma, disabled people, and Soviet prisoners of war. Extermination camps at Auschwitz, Treblinka, and elsewhere processed victims with the efficiency of factories. This case is the most extreme illustration of the enduring issue: the Holocaust shows that modern state power, harnessed to a destructive ideology, can produce atrocity at industrial scale.

The Rwandan Genocide of 1994 demonstrated that even after the postwar international framework had been built, power could still be used to commit mass atrocities. As Document 4 describes, Hutu extremists organized the systematic killing of approximately 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus in 100 days. The Belgian colonial policy had hardened Hutu-Tutsi distinctions; postcolonial governments exploited those divisions; the genocide that resulted was conducted with bureaucratic organization, with radio stations broadcasting names of intended victims. The UN reduced rather than reinforced its peacekeeping force. Major powers refused to use the word genocide to avoid the legal obligation to act. This case shows that the abuse of power continued even with international institutions in place to prevent it.

Power and abuse of power has been an enduring issue precisely because every society contains some asymmetry of power and every period has produced groups willing to use that asymmetry for harm. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Genocide Convention, the International Criminal Court, and the doctrine of Responsibility to Protect all represent the ongoing effort to constrain power and protect those who would otherwise be vulnerable. Contemporary cases including the Chinese persecution of the Uyghurs and the Myanmar government's actions against the Rohingya show that the issue remains active. Maria's generation will need to decide how seriously to take the framework that earlier generations built in response to the catastrophes of the twentieth century.

Why this essay scores high: Clear thesis identifying the issue and previewing three cases. Each body paragraph develops one case with specific facts (King Leopold's Congo, Wannsee Conference and Holocaust scale, Rwanda's 100-day genocide and international failure). Documents are cited explicitly. Outside knowledge added throughout (Berlin Conference, specific death tolls, names of camps, names of postwar institutions). Conclusion reinforces thesis and connects to present. Approximately 500 words; clear structure; specific evidence; sustained argument.

Sample Essay 2: Impact of Technology

Imagine the documents include: a description of factory conditions in industrial Britain, a description of trench warfare in WWI, a description of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, a description of the development of the World Wide Web, and a description of climate change.

Sample essay:

Impact of technology is an enduring issue because throughout modern history new technologies have repeatedly transformed economies, societies, and politics, producing benefits and disruptions whose scale has grown over time. This issue is visible in the Industrial Revolution that began in eighteenth-century Britain and transformed every aspect of European life, in the industrial weapons that made twentieth-century warfare catastrophically destructive, and in the digital revolution that has reshaped daily life since the 1990s. Each transformation has produced both opportunity and harm, demonstrating that the impact of technology depends on how societies choose to develop and deploy it.

The Industrial Revolution that began in Britain around 1750 was the first great technological transformation of the modern era. As Document 1 describes, factories employing steam engines and powered machinery concentrated production and labor in ways that fundamentally changed economic and social life. Workers, including children as young as five, labored 12 to 16 hours a day in dangerous conditions for subsistence wages. Cities expanded rapidly; Manchester grew from 25,000 to 350,000 between 1772 and 1850. The new technology produced unprecedented economic growth and eventually rising living standards, but it also created the conditions that motivated Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels to write the Communist Manifesto and that produced the labor movements and reform legislation of the nineteenth century. The Industrial Revolution illustrates how technology can transform societies in both beneficial and harmful ways simultaneously.

In the twentieth century, industrial technology turned warfare into mass slaughter. As Document 2 describes, World War I introduced machine guns, poison gas, tanks, airplanes, and submarines into combat. The Western Front became a 400-mile line of trenches where industrial firepower produced massive casualties for little territorial gain. Battles like Verdun (perhaps 700,000 casualties) and the Somme (over a million casualties) achieved almost nothing strategically but killed soldiers at unprecedented rates. World War II, ending with the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki described in Document 3, completed this transformation. The atomic bombs killed approximately 210,000 people in two cities and inaugurated the nuclear age, in which great-power war could mean civilizational annihilation. The impact of military technology has been to make warfare both more destructive and, paradoxically, less common between major powers because of the doctrine of mutually assured destruction.

The digital revolution since the 1990s has been a third major technological transformation. As Document 4 describes, Tim Berners-Lee's development of the World Wide Web at CERN in 1989–1991 enabled mass use of the internet. Within two decades the technology had connected billions of people, transformed commerce through e-commerce platforms like Amazon, reshaped news and politics through social media, and made instantaneous global communication possible. Mobile phones spread the technology to over six billion users including in developing countries where landline infrastructure had never reached. The benefits have been immense: rapid scientific cooperation produced COVID-19 vaccines within a year, economic productivity rose, and people across borders could maintain connections previously unimaginable. The costs have included the spread of disinformation, threats to privacy, displacement of traditional industries, and new forms of inequality between those who participate in the digital economy and those who do not.

The impact of technology has been an enduring issue because each new technological transformation reshapes the conditions of human life faster than societies can adapt. The Industrial Revolution produced both unprecedented prosperity and Marx's revolution. Industrial warfare produced both Nazi defeat and the nuclear shadow. The digital revolution has produced both new freedoms and new vulnerabilities. As Document 5 makes clear, the same industrial technology that produced modern prosperity has also produced climate change, perhaps the most consequential single challenge humanity now faces. The pattern continues: artificial intelligence and biotechnology will likely produce the next major transformation. The question is whether societies will learn to manage technology's effects before its impacts overwhelm the institutions designed to govern them.

Why this essay scores high: Clear thesis with three cases previewed. Each case is developed with specific facts (factory worker hours, city population growth, casualty figures, year of WWW development, vaccine timing). Documents cited explicitly throughout. Outside knowledge added (Marx, mutual assured destruction, Berners-Lee at CERN). Conclusion reinforces the thesis and looks forward. Approximately 550 words; sustained argument; specific evidence.

VIII. Quick Reference Summary

This summary brings together the playbook's main points for quick review the night before the exam.

Maria's exam-day workflow

  1. Read the documents (5 minutes)
  2. Match documents to enduring issues; pick the one she can argue best (3 minutes)
  3. Plan her three cases and which documents support each (5 minutes)
  4. Write the essay (30 minutes)
  5. Review (5 minutes)

Top six enduring issues to prepare

Maria should walk into the exam ready to argue any of these:

  • Power and abuse of power: Imperialism, totalitarianism, apartheid, contemporary authoritarianism
  • Conflict: WWI, WWII, Cold War proxy wars, decolonization wars
  • Human rights violations: Armenian Genocide, Holocaust, apartheid, Rwandan Genocide, Cambodian Genocide
  • Desire for human rights: Enlightenment, Gandhi, Mandela, postwar framework, end of communism
  • Nationalism: Italian/German unification, imperialism, fascism/Nazism, anti-colonial nationalism, contemporary nationalism
  • Impact of technology: Industrial Revolution, industrial warfare, atomic bombs, digital revolution, climate change

Universal structure

Paragraph 1 — Introduction:

"[Enduring issue] is an enduring issue because throughout history [definition of why it endures]. This issue is visible in [Case A], in [Case B], and in [Case C]. Each case shows how [thematic statement about the pattern]."

Paragraphs 2–4 — Body:

"[Topic sentence introducing case]. As Document [X] describes, [specific evidence from document]. [Outside knowledge adding specific facts]. [Explanation of how this illustrates the enduring issue]."

Paragraph 5 — Conclusion:

"[Enduring issue] has been an enduring issue because [restatement of why]. [Reference to ongoing relevance, contemporary cases, or continuing struggles]. [Closing thought connecting to the broader pattern]."

Final reminders

  • Name the enduring issue specifically in the thesis.
  • Explain why the issue endures, not just that examples exist.
  • Reference at least three documents explicitly ("As Document 2 shows…").
  • Add outside knowledge: specific names, dates, terms, events.
  • Develop each case with enough detail to be persuasive.
  • Budget at least 40 minutes for this essay.

Maria has prepared more thoroughly than most students will. If she follows this playbook on exam day, she should score 9 or 10 on the Enduring Issues essay.

Good luck.